Dark-Crusader-4's test results

Deck Originality: 1 (If deck is Meta without techs automatic 0)
Deck Speed: 8 (The ability for your deck to set up and respond)
Control of Duel: 8 Max 5 points per duel. (5 points per duel. If the tester loses 0-2 and they feel you had control you will receive 15 points)
Win/Loss ratio: 5 (Win 2-0: 10 Win 2-1: 5 Lose 1-2: 2 Lose 0-2: 0)
Side deck/ability to side deck: 3 (Must show a pic of side. Also if testee wins 2-0 without siding they will receive 4 points)
Rulings/Errors: 10 (If you miss any big rulings or multiple smaller rulings you will receive 0 points)
Ruling test: 7 (The tester will give you the ruling test link)
Deck size: 5 (40-42 10 points, 43-45 5 points, 45+ 0 points)
Concentration: 2 (Must pay attention and mustn't lose focus)
Sportsmanship: 3 (Raging in any form will result in 0 points)
Overall Skill: 7 (This is based on how well your tester believes you did and your skill does reflect the points.)

There are no banned decks at the moment. But meta decks will be listed:
Fire Fists
Water(Mermail/Merlatean)
Geargia/Karakuri
Constellar
Evilswarm
Spellbooks

58/100 Welcome to Terra Firma dorm!
Dorms:
Terra Firma: 0-60 points
Big Saturn: 61-80
Tyrant Neptune: 81-99
Supremacy Sun: 100

Don't get me wrong. Your deck is good and you're not half bad with it. You do need to improve your rulings and, most importantly, to keep calm. I have managed to unnerve you countless times, resulting in misplays on your part. Plus, as you said "I can't make a good deck to save my life" and I'm shouldering it upon myself that you improve. Plus you sided in a card that didn't help you for one that had stalled me for one whole duel... <_<
You're an average duelist with a strong deck and an attitude bent towards rashness. Fix your weak points and enhance your strong ones.

Logging off,
-Sir_Freeland.

i wasnt unerved once during the duel when do you think i did?
and a bls misplay i dont see how it was everything i did with bls was planned so what was my misplay?
Maxx c also was not a misplay

Sir_Freeland wrote:I have managed to unnerve you countless times, resulting in misplays on your part.

lol, thinking a bit highly of yourself there. i really doubt anyone has ever been unnerved playing a childrens card game over the internet.

lol

Nitroglycerin wrote:

Sir_Freeland wrote:I have managed to unnerve you countless times, resulting in misplays on your part.

lol, thinking a bit highly of yourself there. i really doubt anyone has ever been unnerved playing a childrens card game over the internet.

Maybe you're right. It's just the overall impression I got, judging from his replies to anything I said. And dark, everything you did was out of luck and chance. You made some questionable moves nobody would have made, but in doing so you unknowingly cut off my plans (I say unknowingly cause you couldn't know my hand) and thus winning you the match. I'm not giving anything higher than 60 to somebody who only has a good deck cause they have saved up DRA to get it.
You're good; lucky and fairly skilled altogether. Start acting like it! I ain't giving good marks to anybody who lacks good motivation! Take this as a step to move on to something higher, and never, ever give up! As of skill, you'd be in the middle dorm, but this test does not only evaluate skill by itself. And while this may be a children's card game, it reflects who you are surprisingly effectively.

Sir_Freeland